Our approach to organisational consultancy
Our approach to organisational consultancy
Our territory spans the often hidden systems and relationships that determine how organisations perform and how people feel in their work
Posted
27 May 2026
Danny Greenberg via Unsplash
We study how people relate in organisations — the patterns of behaviour, authority and feeling that shape whether a system works or fails. This includes what is visible and what is not: the formal structures and the informal ones, the conscious decisions and the unconscious forces that drive them.
Organisations come to us at moments of genuine difficulty. Sometimes the difficulty is visible: a restructure that created more problems than it solved, a culture everyone knows needs to change but nobody knows how to shift, a leadership team that agrees in the room and fragments outside it. Sometimes it is harder to name: inexplicably lagging performance data, a persistent unease, a sense that something important is being avoided.
Beneath policies, procedures and formal hierarchies lie anxieties, defences, loyalties and conflicts that strongly influence behaviour, decision-making and the performance of teams, departments and whole organisations. Every organisation carries its own unspoken rules about authority and power, its own history of what is said and what is unsayable. The stories people tell about who they are and what is permitted are often more powerful than rational plans.
This is our territory.
Remaining present in uncertainty
The capacity to remain present in uncertainty rather than react defensively to it is at the heart of our work. We call this negative capability, drawing on the poet John Keats.
“…what quality went to form a Man of Achievement… I mean Negative Capability, that is, when a man is capable of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason.”
Keats, 1817
We pay close attention to what is being avoided, to the way anxiety moves through a system and shapes behaviour without anyone quite realising it. We treat resistance and dysfunction not as obstacles but as meaningful signals — expressions of institutional history, or identity under pressure. That is where our diagnostic work begins.
Our goal is to strengthen your organisation’s capacity to think clearly under pressure — and to build that capacity to persist long after we have gone. As our CEO Eliat Aram puts it, this work requires the courage to run towards difficult conversations rather than away from them. That combination of intellectual rigour and genuine courage is what makes it possible.